Hello,
I am installing SABnzbd (SABnzbd-0.6.14-win32-setup.exe) on a Windows 2008 R2 server (64-bit).
It seems to run OK, however when I configure Astraweb, using SSL on port 443, it does not work. When I click on test server, I get an "Unexpected EOF" error.
Do I need to do anything besides run SABnzbd-0.6.14-win32-setup.exe? (i.e. install SSL libraries...)
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
John
Windows 2008 R2 SSL Error
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Re: Windows 2008 R2 SSL Error
You should not have to install anything else.
We very rarely test with Server 2008R2, but last time it worked.
Having said that we've seen trouble with the SSL libraries and 2008R2 in the past.
When it occurs , the only solution is to disable SSL.
With 0.7.0 we'll move to more recent libraries.
We very rarely test with Server 2008R2, but last time it worked.
Having said that we've seen trouble with the SSL libraries and 2008R2 in the past.
When it occurs , the only solution is to disable SSL.
With 0.7.0 we'll move to more recent libraries.
Re: Windows 2008 R2 SSL Error
Thanks for the quick reply.
It looks like moving from eu-ssl.astraweb.com to ssl.astraweb.com fixes the problem.
Could it be something the server is replying with? (i.e. language related)
It looks like moving from eu-ssl.astraweb.com to ssl.astraweb.com fixes the problem.
Could it be something the server is replying with? (i.e. language related)
Re: Windows 2008 R2 SSL Error
Very unlikely, since I use the eu server without any problem.thisisit wrote: Could it be something the server is replying with? (i.e. language related)
I'll add it to my checklist.