Group-based folders removed (explanation)
Posted: June 4th, 2008, 9:54 am
Group-based folders (and also newzbin-category based folders) were removed in 0.4.0, because that they overlap and compete with user-defiend categories. Also it was hard to find a non-confusing user interface.
Newzbin-category based folders are really obsolete, because exactly the same can be accomplished using the user-defined categories.
The group-based folders are a different beast, largely incompatible with user-defined categories.
It could be restored, at the risk of added complexity in the user interface.
We simply assumed that nobody was interested in group-based folders anymore.
One thing I thought of was to use the groups as triggers for the category. The Categories page now contains a column that holds Newzbin category names. I can imagine that you fill in group names there. So group alt.binaries.hdtv.x264 may map to a category called (e.g.) "Movies HD". It would be possible to map multiple groups to one category.
What are your thoughts?
Newzbin-category based folders are really obsolete, because exactly the same can be accomplished using the user-defined categories.
The group-based folders are a different beast, largely incompatible with user-defined categories.
It could be restored, at the risk of added complexity in the user interface.
We simply assumed that nobody was interested in group-based folders anymore.
One thing I thought of was to use the groups as triggers for the category. The Categories page now contains a column that holds Newzbin category names. I can imagine that you fill in group names there. So group alt.binaries.hdtv.x264 may map to a category called (e.g.) "Movies HD". It would be possible to map multiple groups to one category.
What are your thoughts?