can't get REJECT items to NOT download in RSS

Get help with all aspects of SABnzbd
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
rastoma
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: October 21st, 2010, 12:47 pm

can't get REJECT items to NOT download in RSS

Post by rastoma »

Version: 0.5.4
OS: Win7 Ultimate 32bit
Install-type: Windows installer
Firewall Software: built in Windows fw
Are you using IPV6? No
Is the issue reproducible? yes


I have this as REJECT:  720*x264*720p

And it is first before any ACCEPT arguments.

But yet I get two copies of most shows.  Non high def and 720p.  No x264 have dl'd though.

What is wrong with my reject argument?
Last edited by rastoma on October 21st, 2010, 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19773
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: can't get REJECT items to NOT download in RSS

Post by shypike »

You are rejecting jobs that have 720 and x264 and 720p.
And in that order too.
Don't  you mean this?
0 REJECT: 720
1 REJECT: 720p
2 REJECT: x264
rastoma
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: October 21st, 2010, 12:47 pm

Re: can't get REJECT items to NOT download in RSS

Post by rastoma »

shypike wrote: You are rejecting jobs that have 720 and x264 and 720p.
And in that order too.
Don't  you mean this?
0 REJECT: 720
1 REJECT: 720p
2 REJECT: x264
I have the rejects on just one line separated by an *

So each keyword has to be in a separate reject argument?  That's fine as along as it works.  I was just going by the FAQ.

Thanks I'll give that a go.

EDIT:  AHHH... Ok, I see what you're saying now.  I thought the * meant OR but it's AND.

Got it, thanks!
Last edited by rastoma on October 22nd, 2010, 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply