RSS from newznab complaining of unmatched tag

Report & discuss bugs found in SABnzbd
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
psycik
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 108
Joined: September 28th, 2009, 2:33 pm

RSS from newznab complaining of unmatched tag

Post by psycik »

HI

Started the other day, not sure if it started with the upgrade to .7.12 (on windows). But whenever I add as rss feed for a nzbgeek rss feed it complained about an unmatched tag at 56,2.

Putting the same url into firefox gets an rss feed with no problems.

Have there been any other reports of this lately?

here's the full log line with some values redacted:

Code: Select all

2013-06-07 14:21:41,539::INFO::[rss:349] Failed to retrieve RSS from https://nzbgeeks-private-vig-address/rss?t=5000&i=2&num=50&r=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: <unknown>:56:2: mismatched tag
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19773
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: RSS from newznab complaining of unmatched tag

Post by shypike »

It's not a proper XML file.
Probably Firefox is a bit more lenient that SABnzbd, but the problem is caused by the indexer.
psycik
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 108
Joined: September 28th, 2009, 2:33 pm

Re: RSS from newznab complaining of unmatched tag

Post by psycik »

So I ran the feed through a validator, and it complained as well.

Trouble is I then constructed a url from somewhere else it it validated. Not quite sure what I did, but have it going now.
Post Reply