Zero (0) space available?
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Re: Zero (0) space available?
Oh ya, it isn't really urgent, just an annoyance that I would like to fix if I can.
Re: Zero (0) space available?
Both MacOSX and Linux understand "df -m", and will report the disk free in MB's. So we could use that.1gr8ftoy wrote:df -BG
df: illegal option -- B
usage: df [-b | -H | -h | -k | -m | -g | -P] [-ailn] [-T type] [-t] [filesystem ...]
df -k shows in 1k blocks on a Mac.
Additional question: can you login on your unraid system, and then run the python statvfs commands? If the free space reported is incorrect, the bug is really in python/statvfs. If it is correct, the problem is probably in the network protocol.
On my Ubuntu I mounted the Mac-dmg, and indeed I can't find sabnzbd/misc.py in there. It does contain a ".journal" of 8MB. Do you see that too (and is it one big binary executable, just like on Windows), or is that file unpacked on your Mac?1gr8ftoy wrote:
I cannot find misc.py to save my life. I am looking inside the SABnzbd+ package and there is everything under the sun except that file. I searched my whole computer and can't find a misc.py in a sab folder. Where do I look for it on a Mac system?
Another option: there is also a source package for Mac. On http://sourceforge.net/projects/sabnzbd ... bd-0.6.15/ it is called SABnzbd-0.6.15-osx-src.tar.gz ... Are you able to run that? I don't know if that needs additional libraries ...
Re: Zero (0) space available?
It can't be the protocol because finder/df report the correct sizes...it is ok I will just hope that someday it gets fixed in SAB lol.