This issue has been mentioned before, and I do it again because yesterday I was flabbergasted again when this happened on a friend's system:
SABnzbd will report a slow/zero download speed if the download is "missing from all servers", for example if the post/NZB is too old.
Technically, this is correct. However, when you see a slow/zero download speed, you start searching everywhere what could be causing that: Internet connection, newsserver account, disk space, number of newsserver, etc. Only after test on another system, I saw the "missing from all servers" and I then saw that the post/NZB was too old.
Oh, still surprising: trying to download a non-existing post takes about the same time as an existing post. I would think it would take less time.
So: is there a way to make a user clear that the slow/zero dowload speed is caused by the "missing from all servers"?
slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
If you have multiple servers, SABnzbd is going to try them all.
Also many servers aren't very quick at telling you that the article is missing.
There's room for improvement, but it will take a while.
Also many servers aren't very quick at telling you that the article is missing.
There's room for improvement, but it will take a while.
Re: slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
As a test, I now have a 900 MB sized 212 day old post in my queue, with only one server defined (eweka). Of course, with this age, the post is missing on the server.
It seems the process of "non-downloading" will even take longer than a normal download of 900 MB (which would only take 15 minutes on my line): After 10 - 15 minutes the queue still says: "871.71/914.63 MB"
Download speed: 0.00 KB/s - Queued: 847.58/914.63 MB - Sysload 0.67, 0.85, 0.79
It seems the process of "non-downloading" will even take longer than a normal download of 900 MB (which would only take 15 minutes on my line): After 10 - 15 minutes the queue still says: "871.71/914.63 MB"
Download speed: 0.00 KB/s - Queued: 847.58/914.63 MB - Sysload 0.67, 0.85, 0.79
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
It can still be slow response from the server.
But I'll do some tests.
But I'll do some tests.
Re: slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
I've sent the NZB to bugs@sabnzbd.org
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: slow/zero dowload speed causes by ... "missing from all servers"
Testing with my low-retention ISP's news server.
It really is the server that's slow in responding.
Getting the "missing" answer takes about as long as getting the article.
The faster your connection is, the worse the effect seems to be.
The time it takes to receive "missing" is fairly constant.
We are thinking about better approaches in detecting over-aged articles,
but that's for the future.
It really is the server that's slow in responding.
Getting the "missing" answer takes about as long as getting the article.
The faster your connection is, the worse the effect seems to be.
The time it takes to receive "missing" is fairly constant.
We are thinking about better approaches in detecting over-aged articles,
but that's for the future.
Last edited by shypike on February 3rd, 2009, 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

