Support Forum

Ok.

Thanks for taking the time.

I've done more testing with the following results. I uninstalled sabyenc and downloaded the same 2.5 GB file twice with 2.0.0 and 1.2.1 alternating the downlaods between the versions and found 2.0.0 was 12 Mb/s slower than 1.2.1. I reinstalled sabyenc and completed the same test with the same file a...

Well I saw the same results today as I did yesterday. For some reason 2.0.0 is slower, by about 10 - 15 Mb/s, for me than 1.2.1B1. I didn't try the pip uninstall sabyenc. Is 2.0.0 slower for anyone else or is it just me?

Yes, pip uninstall sabyenc Thanks, I wondered if it was that easy. I am surprised. It seems more likely that it's a drop in network/newsserver than 2.0.0. The improvements in 2.0.0 have been so great that it can only be similar, not slower. Maybe keep watching it for a few more downloads? I can mak...

I guess I spoke to soon as 2.0.0 is now downloading noticeably slower than 1.2.1. The time difference between the two to dl the same 3.7 GB file is now around 45 seconds and when I watch the network speed monitor it shows 1.2.1 running 120-130 Mb/s and 2.0.0 running 100-110 Mb/s. Can I uninstall sab...

I'm running sab from a RAM drive on a system with an older i7 so no speed bump for me. :( I downloaded the same 4 GB file twice with 1.2.1 and twice with 2.0.0 and all the downloads were within 12 seconds of each other. I'm running sab from source so it's really easy to switch back and forth. Thanks...

Thanks for the quick response and the help. It turns out that I was just missing the --upgrade at the end of the pip install sabyenc line. I guess that's what happens when you try to throw it in quickly at the end of day/night. I already had gcc and redhat-rpm-config installed and I didn't need to i...

I'm running Fedora 25 Workstation and had been running sabnzbd 1.2.1 Final. When I ran pip install sabyenc I received this error. When I ran pip -V it reported pip 9.0.1 from /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages (python 2.7). Do you think this is a Fedora issue or something else? https://i.imgur.com/RNu...

Cool. The next time I run across one I'll make a copy and email it to you.

Thanks

I was wondering if sabnzbd used to contain support for uuencoded files. The reason I'm asking is that within the past 4 or 5 months I've seen several uuencoded file errors, the nzbs were all 2000+ days old, but in the years I've been using sabnzbd prior to 5 months ago I never had this issue. Does a...

Excellent. Thanks for the quick reply.

Sorry I forgot to add my system info and I didn't see a way to edit my original post.

Version: (1.2.0 final)
OS: (Arch)
Install-type: (running from source)
Skin (if applicable): (Glitter - Night)
Firewall Software: (firewalld)
Are you using IPV6? (no)
Is the issue reproducible? (yes)

I noticed a while back that if I grabbed an nzb from a free search engine like nzbindex.com sabnzbd would categorzie it as default even if I had a catagory with the proper group setup. Today I managed to do some testing and found that if I setup a Category and enter more than one group in the 'Index...

Cool that's what I was hoping to hear.

I really just did the extra debugging to make sure I didn't have any dependency issues. I'm switching from Ubuntu to Fedora and there don't seem to be any RC builds for Fedora so I thought I'd try running from source. So far so good.

I'm running Fedora 24 and I have sabnzbd setup to run from source. I changed logging to debug and ran sab for a while and when I went back through the log I didn't see any errors. Is there anything else I should look at to make sure I'm "running clean"? When I read through the readme and i...