Ahhshypike wrote:Not really, as the list isn't public
It's one of these small things that gets drowned in a long list of more urgent things
No worries at all, SABnzbd+ has been working very well for me - thanks to everyone who made it possible!
Search found 3 matches
- October 11th, 2011, 9:52 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Queue Size In Larger Units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1977
Re: Queue Size In Larger Units
No worries at all, SABnzbd+ has been working very well for me - thanks to everyone who made it possible!
- October 11th, 2011, 9:35 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Queue Size In Larger Units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1977
Re: Queue Size In Larger Units
Thanks, my mistakeshypike wrote:It's on the wishlist.
- October 11th, 2011, 8:49 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Queue Size In Larger Units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1977
Queue Size In Larger Units
I have a queue in the GBs (around 400), but SABnzbd+ seems to report the size in MB. Other size measurements within the web GUI use TB/GB when past applicable - is it possible the queue size counter was missed?